ArticlePain reports2025
A 5000-year overview of the history of pain through ancient civilizations to modern pain theories.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Technique for Tramadol Dose Accuracy: Are Dosing Pumps the Solution?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intraoperative Magnesium Sulfate and Early Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Retrospective Clinical Study Integrating Molecular Docking and Protein Interaction Network Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain and its management have been a predominant issue since the dawn of humanity. Pain has been the subject of much controversy and has constantly evolved across societies. The objective of this review is to trace the historical evolution of the concept of pain through the ages and to attempt to understand how modern theories of pain represent a legacy of ancestral knowledge passed down from culture to culture. We conducted a comprehensive review of primary and secondary sources across 6 major historical periods, including Pre-history, Antiquity, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the Modern, and Contemporary eras, using academic databases, specialized libraries, and historical archives. Results shows that during ancient civilizations, the understanding of pain oscillated between religious beliefs and medical advances. Antiquity societies made significant contributions to the understanding of pain mechanisms and management. Contrary to popular belief, significant advances were made during the Middle Ages despite the important impact of religion on the era's conceptualization of pain. During the Renaissance, the influence of religion waned, and secular medicine made significant progress. The development of pain theories peaked in the 19th century with technological advances. Long considered an expression of internal suffering, pain has fascinated humanity throughout history. The way pain has been perceived, understood, and treated has changed greatly over the centuries. This historical scientific review allows us to keep in mind that the vision we have of pain in Western society is predominantly based on the concrete heritage of ancient civilizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.