Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190777›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2024

Endovascular Treatment of Type II Endoleaks: Update and Overview.

Christina G Dalzell, Daniel P Sheeran, John F Angle, Luke R Wilkins

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina G DalzellDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Daniel P SheeranDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
John F AngleDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Luke R WilkinsDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoleaks are a common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair, despite EVAR being the preferred method for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Endoleaks are continued blood flow into the aneurysmal sac, or more broadly elevated pressure outside of the endograft, and are classified into five types based on the source of blood flow or elevated pressure. Type II endoleaks are the most common and are a result of retrograde flow to the sac most commonly from the inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar artery. Endovascular treatment options for type II endoleaks include transarterial, transcaval, translumbar, and transabdominal approaches. This review discusses the indication for endovascular treatment of type II endoleaks, the selection of approach, and technical considerations.

Indexed as

aneurysmembolizationendograftendoleakinterventional radiology

Identifiers

PMID40190777
PMCPMC11970967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.