ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The relationship between epigenetic biomarkers and the risk of diabetes and cancer: a machine learning modeling approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Personal, Behavioral, Psychological, Biochemical and Molecular Biomarkers with Illness Count in a Sample of Mexican Individuals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Alterations Induced by Smoking and Their Intersection with Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Epigenetic biomarkers are molecular indicators of epigenetic changes, and some studies have suggested that these biomarkers have predictive power for disease risk. This study aims to analyze the relationship between 30 epigenetic biomarkers and the risk of diabetes and cancer using machine learning modeling. Methods: The data for this study were sourced from the NHANES database, which includes DNA methylation arrays and epigenetic biomarker datasets. Nine machine learning algorithms were used to build models: AdaBoost, GBM, KNN, lightGBM, MLP, RF, SVM, XGBoost, and logistics. Model stability was evaluated using metrics such as Accuracy, MCC, and Sensitivity. The performance and decision-making ability of the models were displayed using ROC curves and DCA curves, while SHAP values were used to visualize the importance of each epigenetic biomarker. Results: Epigenetic age acceleration was strongly associated with cancer risk but had a weaker relationship with diabetes. In the diabetes model, the top three contributing features were logA1Mort, family income-to-poverty ratio, and marital status. In the cancer model, the top three contributing features were gender, non-Hispanic White ethnicity, and PACKYRSMort. Conclusion: Our study identified the relationship between epigenetic biomarkers and the risk of diabetes and cancer, and used machine learning techniques to analyze the contributions of various epigenetic biomarkers to disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.