Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The effect of fiber intake on the association of pesticide exposure and hypertension: a population-level study.

Haili Lai, Xiaoqin Xin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haili LaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ganzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaoqin XinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between pesticide exposure and the risk of hypertension is inconsistent. Moreover, little is known about the effects of dietary fiber intake on the association between pesticide exposure and the risk of hypertension. This study aimed to assess whether fiber intake alters the relationship between pesticide exposure and hypertension. The study included 14,218 American adult patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between pesticide exposure and the risk of hypertension. We also examined the relationship between pesticide metabolites in urine specimens and hypertension. Participants were stratified based on their mean fiber intake (low fiber intake: <17 gm and high fiber intake: ≥17 gm). An interaction test between dietary fiber intake, pesticide exposure, and risk of hypertension was conducted. Exposure to pesticides increased the risk of hypertension in the crude and full-adjusted models, and their odds ratio (ORs) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] were 1.40 (1.26-1.56) and 1.19 (1.05-1.34), respectively. The analysis of pesticide metabolites indicated that dimethyldithiophosphate was statistically associated with hypertension (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02). The association between pesticide exposure and hypertension was opposite among participants in low and high fiber intake groups, OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.14-1.58 vs. OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.80-1.20, respectively, which implied that a high fiber intake may decrease the risk of hypertension (interaction likelihood ratio test:

Indexed as

Dietary FiberEnvironmental ExposureHypertensionPesticidesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsDietary FiberPesticidesfiber intakehypertensioninteractionpesticide exposurerisk

Identifiers

PMID40190760
PMCPMC11968753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.