ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2025
Dark Chocolate Elevates Resting Energy Expenditure in Postmenopausal Women.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several recent reports have indicated positive health benefits of consuming (-)-epicatechin-rich cocoa products. Postmenopausal women are predisposed to reduced metabolism due to decreased levels and activity of the sex hormones estrogen, progesterone, and estradiol. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of dark chocolate consumption on resting and exercise metabolism in postmenopausal women. Using a randomized, double-blind design, 26 postmenopausal participants were assigned to a 30-day supplementation with 20-g per day of 72% dark chocolate (DC) or calorically matched white chocolate (WC). Before supplementation, participants underwent two control trials for assessments (PRE1, PRE2) of resting energy expenditure (REE) and exercise energy expenditure (EEE). Following the PRE2 assessment, participants were randomized and supplemented for 30 days, after which they repeated the assessments for REE and EEE. PRE1 and PRE2 REE and EEE were not significantly different within or between groups (REE: PRE1 DC 1215± 170, WC 1127 ± 174, p=0.662; PRE2 DC 1211 ± 174, WC 1145 ± 165 kcal/d, p=0.720; EEE: PRE1 DC 3.67 ± 0.72, WC 3.40 ± 0.81, p=0.665; PRE2 DC 3.41 ± 0.88, WC 3.39 ± 0.73kcal/min, p=0.373). Post-supplementation REE was significantly increased by 3.2% in the DC group (Pre-Post change: DC 38.6 ± 49, WC -15 ± 31.2 kcal per day, p =0.039, Cohen's d= 0.724 [95% CI: 0.078, 1.513]). These results indicate that DC supplementation in postmenopausal women was associated with a significant 3.2% increase in REE with no significant influence on EEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.