ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
The Anteroposterior Diameter of Complete Discoid Lateral Meniscus Versus the Diameter of Normal Lateral Meniscus: An MRI Study in Adults.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The diagnostic accuracy of a practical morphometric ratio on MRI for the discoid lateral meniscus.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Association of knee osseous morphometric parameters with degeneration and tear of the discoid lateral meniscus: a cross-sectional quantitative MRI study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The abnormal morphology of complete discoid lateral meniscus (CDLM) is associated with a greater propensity for tears. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphology of CDLM is most often described in the coronal plane, with few morphological studies in the sagittal position. Hypothesis: The sagittal anteroposterior diameter of CDLM is smaller than that of normal meniscus and is increased after tear in adults. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors searched the radiology records at our institution from June 2018 to December 2023 for patients aged from 18 to 55 years with knee pain. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 70 knees (66 patients) with torn CDLM were enrolled as group A, 36 knees (31 patients) with intact CDLM were enrolled as group B, and 48 knees (32 patients) with normal lateral meniscus (LM) were enrolled as group C. The coronal view passing through the middle point of the lateral tibial plateau (LTP) were identified the referrence coronal view, then the sagittal view passing through the middle point of the LTP on the referrence coronal view were selected for the measurements, the anterior distance, posterior distance, and anteroposterior diameter of the LM, sagittal tibial diameter (TD) were measured. The 4 measurements and the ratios were compared among the groups by independent sample Results: The reliability of all measurements was excellent, except that posterior distance was classified as good in group B. The anteroposterior diameter and TD were smaller in group A than in group C (both Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that in adults, the meniscal anteroposterior diameter and the TD are smaller in CDLM than in normal LM, and the anteroposterior diameter of torn CDLM is larger than intact CDLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.