ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2024
Challenges of Serum Creatinine Level in GFR Assessment and Drug Dosing Decisions in Kidney Injury.
Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Renal Dose Adjustment in European Primary Care: Clinical Nuances and Practical Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Glomerular hyperfiltration and enhanced sensitivity to kidney ischemia reperfusion with a blunted KIM-1 response in young male aging-accelerated SAMP8 mice.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota-metabolite interactions in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury in rats.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Association between blood urea nitrogen-to-creatinine ratio and mortality risk in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serum creatinine (SCr) is widely regarded as a standard biomarker for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and is commonly used to guide dose adjustments for renally eliminated drugs. However, the application of SCr as a marker for evaluating GFR and drug dosing in kidney injury has significant limitations that are often overlooked in clinical practice. This oversight can result in subtherapeutic drug concentrations or adverse drug reactions due to inappropriate dosing adjustments based on SCr levels alone. This review aimed to highlight the factors affecting serum creatinine (SCr) and the challenges associated with using SCr as a biomarker for assessing GFR and adjusting drug doses with regard to its limitations and variability. The findings of this review underscore the complexity of SCr regulation, which is affected by its synthesis, metabolism, and excretion processes (glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, tubular reabsorption and extra-renal elimination), and disease states (such as trauma-induced hyperfiltration and HIV) and the use of medications (drug-creatinine interactions) lead to altered renal excretion of creatinine, either increasing or decreasing its levels. Additionally, the renal excretion pathways for drugs and creatinine are not entirely the same, making it difficult to use creatinine to evaluate drug renal excretion. In conclusion, SCr is an imperfect index of GFR and adjusting drug dosing, and the development of multi-biomarker panels, incorporating biomarkers from different excretory pathways-particularly those involving tubular transport-holds promise for improving the evaluation of renal excretory function and ensuring safer and more effective drug dosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.