ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Real-Time Snoring Detection Using Deep Learning: A Home-Based Smartphone Approach for Sleep Monitoring.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating Sleep-Stage Distribution from Respiratory Sounds via Deep Audio Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning approaches for image-based snoring sound analysis in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome: A systematic review.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Snoring sound classification in patients with cerebrovascular stenosis based on an improved ConvNeXt model.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the prevalence of sleep-related disorders, few studies have developed deep learning models to predict snoring using home-recorded smartphone audio. This study proposes a real-time snoring detection method utilizing a Vision Transformer-based deep learning model and smartphone recordings. Methods: Participants' sleep-breathing sounds were recorded using smartphones, with concurrent Level I or II polysomnography (PSG) conducted in home or hospital settings. A total of 200 minutes of smartphone audio per participant, corresponding to 400 30-second sleep stage epochs on PSG, were sampled. Each epoch was annotated independently by two trained labelers, with snoring labeled only when both agreed. Model performance was evaluated by epoch-by-epoch prediction accuracy and correlation between observed and predicted snoring ratios. Results: The study included 214 participants (85,600 epochs). Hospital audio data from 105 participants (42,000 epochs) were used for training, while home audio data from 109 participants were split into 54 participants (21,600 epochs) for training and 55 participants (22,000 epochs) for testing. On the test dataset, the model demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.8% and a specificity of 91.3%. Correlation analysis showed strong agreement between observed and predicted snoring ratios (r = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using deep learning for real-time snoring detection from home-recorded smartphone audio. With high accuracy and scalability, the approach offers a practical and accessible tool for monitoring sleep-related disorders, paving the way for home-based sleep health management solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.