ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical efficacy of etonogestrel implants on relieving dysmenorrhea in endometriosis and adenomyosis women for up to 3 years.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peppermint oil in menstrual disorders and menopausal symptoms: a research progress review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Management of abnormal bleeding in etonogestrel-releasing implant users: quo vadis? An exploratory study on the attitudes of a cohort of Italian gynaecologists and review of the literature.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Review
- The Sebaceous Gland: A Key Player in the Balance Between Homeostasis and Inflammatory Skin Diseases.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dysmenorrhea and menstrual disorders caused by endometriosis (EM) and adenomyosis (AM) have significantly affected the quality of life of a large number of women. As a highly effective clinical contraceptive measure, etonogestrel implants have been previously reported to relieve dysmenorrhea. However, the dysmenorrhea treatment and menstrual regulation effects of etonogestrel implants in AM and EM patients have not been systematically studied. Methods: This retrospective study followed up 100 patients with etonogestrel implants from May 2015 to October 2016, including 44 patients with EM and 56 patients with AM. The VAS scores of dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, and related adverse events were measured at 12, 24, and 36 months after etonogestrel implantation in these patients. Results: In 100 EM and AM patients, dysmenorrhea significantly improved, with moderate and severe cases decreasing from 50 to 16 and 0% at 36 months. Amenorrhea increased over time, and frequent bleeding declined. Adverse reactions included weight gain (21%), acne (13%), and decreased sexual desire (10%). Serum CA125 levels dropped, confirming therapeutic efficacy. Conclusion: Etonogestrel implantation significantly alleviated dysmenorrhea symptoms in AM and EM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.