ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Robotic-assisted lung nodule diagnosis and resection.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigating lateral sensing blind spots: A dual-segment bronchoscopic robot with a bioinspired skin.Science advances · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Immunotherapy Era: Navigating Altered Anatomy, Oncologic Precision, and the Future of Integrated Platforms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Innovations in Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy: Current Trends and Future Prospects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Single anesthetic bronchoscopic biopsy to robotic resection workflow.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the care of lung cancer patients, early diagnosis followed by timely therapeutic procedures can have a significant impact on overall survival and patient anxiety. While robotic-assisted lung resection is now a widely accepted surgical approach, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy is a more recent diagnostic procedure that improves reach, stability, and precision in the field of bronchoscopic lung nodule biopsy. The ability to combine lung cancer diagnostics with curative-intent surgical resection into a single-setting anesthesia procedure has the potential to decrease costs, improve patient experiences, and most importantly, reduce delays in cancer care. In addition, with the expected adoption of sublobar resection for stage I lung cancer ≤2cm, combining robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with robotic surgery offers a single-setting pathway to take advantage of the precision biopsy and localization technique offered by robotic-assisted bronchoscopy and the precision operation offered by robotic surgery. We herein describe our approach to this single-setting procedure. While limited studies suggest that the combined approach results in shorter overall operative time and cost, we need future work to better characterize the overall operative time, complication rates, long-term oncologic outcomes, and cost analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.