Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190518›Full record

Observational studyAfrican health sciences2024

Fertility outcome of intravaginal insemination in women with unconsummated marriages.

Rubina Izhar, Samia Husain, Zubaida Masood

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rubina IzharDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Abbasi Shaheed hospital & karachi medical and Dental College Karachi, Pakistan.
Samia HusainDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Aziz Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan.
Zubaida MasoodDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Abbasi Shaheed Hospital & Karachi Medical and Dental college Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: To assess the fertility outcome of intravaginal insemination in women with unconsummated marriages. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study from January 2017 to October 2020. The study population comprised of couples with unconsummated marriages. Participants were divided into three groups: (1) women with vaginismus (2) men with erectile dysfunction(ED); and (3) men who suffered from premature ejaculation (PE). The couple was educated about the fertility period and advised to perform insemination at home on every alternate day for at least twelve cycles. Pregnancy was defined as a positive urine pregnancy test. The couple was asked to report a positive pregnancy test or follow up at the end of twelve months in case conception did not occur. Results: The study comprised of 769 couples. There were 371 couples with vaginismus, 258 with premature ejaculation and 140 with erectile dysfunction. Pregnancy was achieved in 270(72.8%) couples with vaginismus, 181(70.2%) with premature ejaculation and 72(51.4%) with erectile dysfunction. The time to conception was shortest for couples with vaginismus, 7.72±3.02 months and longest for couples with erectile dysfunction 10.81±1.53 months. Conclusion: Couples with unconsummated marriages conceive with intravaginal insemination. At home insemination is a treatment option for such couples before embarking on artificial reproductive techniques.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionFertilityInsemination, ArtificialMarriagePremature EjaculationAdultFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesFertility outcomeintravaginal inseminationunconsummated marriages

Identifiers

PMID40190518
PMCPMC11970164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.