ArticleAfrican health sciences2024
Caesarean sections among east African refugees and their host population: a 20-year retrospective study in western Tanzania.
Article in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editor's choice: Infections, sexual reproductive health and non-communicable diseases.African health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Half of the 35.3 million refugees worldwide are women and a third are of childbearing age, making reproductive healthcare in humanitarian settings indispensable. Caesarean section (CS) is the most common operation worldwide, accounting for 18.6% of births. Objective: This study provides a descriptive analysis of caesarean sections (CS) in a protracted refugee setting. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of CS recorded in logbooks between November 2000 and September 2020, inclusive. Data was abstracted from paper logbooks and included date, nationality, sex, age, and indication. Analysis was performed in STATA. Results: 8,461 CS were performed over the 20-year period. The average age was 24.6 years. Tanzanian patients made up 25% (n=2,116) of the population. The most common indications for CS for both Tanzanians and refugees were cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD), previous scar, and fetal distress. There was a significant difference in the proportion of adolescent and adult patients for the indications of CPD, previous scar, fetal distress, malposition, placenta previa, prolapse, and antepartum hemorrhage (APH). Conclusion: There is a significant amount of CS performed in this humanitarian setting. Refugees and Tanzanians utilize these services. Outcome data are needed to identify if CS in this setting reduces neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Funding: American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32 (Award: 2T32AR67708-6); Association for Academic Surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.