ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Early experience with a novel transapical transcatheter aortic valve system in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective, multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement on aortic root remodeling: a pre- and post-procedure CTA comparative analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Preprocedural computed tomography angiography aortic root geometry and 1-year left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Registered, prospective, multicenter study of the short-term clinical outcomes of a novel transcatheter aortic valve system (Xcor system, Saint Medical Technology, Inc., Nanjing) to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods: 130 high risk patients with symptomatic severe AS from 11 institutions were treated with the novel Xcor system. All patients were pre-TAVR assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography of the aortic valve (AV) and relevant left cardiac and vascular anatomy. Procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up clinical outcomes were evaluated after procedures. Results: The average age of the 130 patients was 71.2 ± 4.4 years old, 55.4% were male, and the STS score was 8.0 ± 3.9%. Device and procedural success were achieved in 98.5% and 97.7% of the patients, respectively. At 30-day follow-up, all-cause mortality, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, major vascular complications, and new permanent pacemaker implantation were 3.8%, 4.6%, 0.8%, and 0.8%, respectively. 7.7% of patients showed ≥ mild paravalvular leakage, and all 125 (100%) patients were in New York Heart Association Class ≤ II. The procedural and clinical outcomes of bicuspid AV patients were similar to those of tricuspid AV patients. Conclusions: Overall, the 30-day follow-up shows that the procedural outcomes with the novel Xcor system with self-centering support arms are comparable or superior to other contemporary TAVI devices, with a low all-cause mortality, low major adverse cardiovascular events, low PVL and similar clinical outcomes for BAV and TAV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.