Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190383›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2025

Validation of the IDF-DAR risk assessment tool for Ramadan fasting in patients with diabetes in primary care.

Latifa Baynouna Alketbi, Bachar Afandi, Nico Nagelkerke, Hanan Abdubaqi, Ruqaya Abdulla Al Nuaimi, Mariam Rashed Al Saedi, Fatima Ibrahim Al Blooshi, Noura Salem Al Blooshi, Aysha Mohammed AlAryani, Nouf Mohammed Al Marzooqi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Latifa Baynouna Alketbi *Academic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Bachar Afandi *Internal Medicine Department, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Nico NagelkerkeCollege of Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Hanan AbdubaqiAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Ruqaya Abdulla Al NuaimiAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mariam Rashed Al SaediAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Fatima Ibrahim Al BlooshiAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Noura Salem Al BlooshiAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Aysha Mohammed AlAryaniAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Nouf Mohammed Al MarzooqiAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Amal Abdullah Al KhouriAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Shamsa Ahmed Al MansooriAcademic Affairs Department, Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammad HassaneinInternal Medicine Department, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In patients with diabetes intending to fast, Ramadan, risk assessment, and stratification are essential for an individualized treatment plan. It seems that the new IDF-DAR risk stratification tool (International Diabetes Federation - Diabetes and Ramadan Alliance) has become the primary tool in this setting. This study aims to validate this tool in the Abu Dhabi population. Method: The assessment was performed before Ramadan, followed by an evaluation of any significant outcome after Ramadan through tele-interview and an electronic medical records review. Patients were included if the attending physicians used the tool in the risk assessment of the patients within 6 weeks before Ramadan 1,444 (CE 2022) in the AHS healthcare center. Results: The study included 435 patients. Half (51.7%) were in the low-risk category of the IDF-DAR risk stratification tool, 28.5% were in the moderate-risk category, and 19.8% were in the higher-risk category. Of the total patients, 81.3% fasted during the entire Ramadan period and 18.7% attempted to fast. A total of 14 (3.8%) patients were admitted at least once, and 56 (12.9%) had at least one significant event, including admission to the hospital. Using univariable logistic regression, the occurrence of adverse events was significantly associated with more days not fasted, Conclusion: According to the IDF-DAR risk assessment, patients with diabetes in the low-risk category had a better outcome than those in the moderate- or high-risk categories regarding SAEs. Another independent risk factor is if the patient is frail, according to the FRAIL scoring.

Indexed as

adverse eventsdiabetes mellitusfastingRamadanrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40190383
PMCPMC11968361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.