ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Adaptive Whole-Brain Dynamics Predictive Method: Relevancy to Mental Disorders.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Headache psychiatry: A structured narrative review and integrative framework.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Review
- Small-Molecule Boron-10-Enriched Carriers with Exceptional Aqueous Solubility for Enhanced Boron Neutron Capture Therapy of Malignant Tumors.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Targeting ApoE-KCC2 Signaling Rescues GABAergic Synaptic Dysfunction and Depression-like Behaviors in Mice.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Altered functional network topology and connectivity in female nurses with shift work sleep disorder.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Hopf whole-brain model, based on structural connectivity, overcomes limitations of traditional structural or functional connectivity-focused methods by incorporating heterogeneity parameters, quantifying dynamic brain characteristics in healthy and diseased states. Traditional parameter fitting techniques lack precision, restricting broader use. To address this, we validated parameter fitting methods using simulated networks and synthetic models, introducing improvements such as individual-specific initialization and optimized gradient descent, which reduced individual data loss. We also developed an approximate loss function and gradient adjustment mechanism, enhancing parameter fitting accuracy and stability. Applying this refined method to datasets for major depressive disorder (MDD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we identified differences in brain regions between patients and healthy controls, explaining related anomalies. This rigorous validation is crucial for clinical application, paving the way for precise neuropathological identification and novel treatments in neuropsychiatric research, demonstrating substantial potential in clinical neurology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.