ArticleDigital health
Beyond the STI clinic: Use of administrative claims data and machine learning to develop and validate patient-level prediction models for gonorrhea.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gonorrhea is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that, untreated, can result in debilitating complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease, pain, and infertility. A minority of cases are diagnosed in STI clinics in the United States. Gonorrhea is often asymptomatic and presumed to be substantially underdiagnosed and/or undertreated. Objectives: To generate and compare predictive machine learning (ML) models using administrative claims data to characterize young women in the general United States population who would be most likely to contract gonorrhea. Methods: Data were extracted from the Merative™ MarketScan Results: Models constructed using tree-based algorithms such as XGBoost provided the best discriminatory results, but simpler ridge regressions models with splines also achieved reasonable discrimination, allowing for the identification of population subsets at increased risk of gonorrhea infection. A subset of 0.1% of the population identified by the XGBoost model had a 70-fold higher risk of gonorrhea than the general population. External validation applying the different models on a Medicaid dataset that was not included in developing the original models was checked and deemed acceptable. Conclusions: The models and methods presented here could facilitate the identification of women at high risk of contracting gonorrhea for whom targeted preventive measures may be most beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.