ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
Development and validation of an ensemble learning risk model for sepsis after abdominal surgery.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio a useful index in the differential diagnosis of malignancy and tuberculosis-related ascites?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although their importance has gained attention, the clinical applications of methods for screening patients at high risk of sepsis after abdominal surgery have been restricted. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate models for screening patients at high risk of sepsis after abdominal surgery based on machine learning with routine variables. Material and methods: The whole dataset was composed of three representative academic hospitals in China and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Routine clinical variables were implemented for model development. The Boruta algorithm was applied for feature selection. Afterwards, ensemble learning and eight other conventional algorithms were used for model fitting and validation based on all features and selected features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, accuracy, net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves were used for model evaluation. Results: A total of 955 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were finally analyzed (sepsis: 285, non-sepsis: 670). After feature selection, the ensemble learning model constructed by integrating k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) yielded the ROC AUC of 0.892 (0.841-0.944) and accuracy of 85.0% on the test data, and the ROC AUC of 0.782 (0.727-0.838) and accuracy of 68.1% on the validation data, which performed best. Albumin, ASA score, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, age, and glucose were the top features associated with postoperative sepsis by KNN and SVM. Conclusions: We developed a new and potential generalizable model to preoperatively screen patients at high risk of sepsis after abdominal surgery, with the advantages of a representative training cohort and routine variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.