ArticleNursing inquiry2025
Stirring the Sleeping Giant? an Evaluation of a Planetary Health Political Action Sequential Simulation for Nursing Students.
Article in Nursing inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metaphorically speaking: considerations in applying metaphor to your research higher degree.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The need for nurses to be political is as great as ever, however, nursing has a complicated relationship with politics and political action. This paper examines the impact of a sequential simulation learning activity that sought to transform students' values and attitudes towards political action in addressing Planetary Health issues. Adult and adult mental health nursing students from two British universities participated in the Political Action Sequential Simulation which had three scenarios related to either water or air pollution. Scenario one was clinical, while scenarios two and three were community- and policy-based, respectively. We used a pre-post design to gauge attitudes and values both before and after the intervention. Outcomes measures included Nurse Professional Value Scale-3, Political Efficacy - Short Scale, Perceived Political Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form, Social Justice Scale and Internal Environmental Locus of Control scale. Of the 256 students who undertook the activity, 75 completed both pre and post-measures. Significant shifts across all scales except the social justice scale were found, meaning that students' attitudes towards political action, their beliefs in their ability to take political action, and in particular, action related to the environment shifted significantly after the sequential simulation. We discuss these results in the context of the broader literature, reflect on some of the reasons why these shifts occurred and consider the implications for nursing education and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.