Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190272›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2025

Stirring the Sleeping Giant? an Evaluation of a Planetary Health Political Action Sequential Simulation for Nursing Students.

Lydia Mainey, Ryan Essex, Philip Gurnett, Sarah Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lydia MaineySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Cairns, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-8061
Ryan EssexInstitute of Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Philip GurnettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Sarah RichardsonSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Essex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-4384

Funding

This study was supported by an Association for Simulated Practice in Healthcare (ASPiH) research grant.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for nurses to be political is as great as ever, however, nursing has a complicated relationship with politics and political action. This paper examines the impact of a sequential simulation learning activity that sought to transform students' values and attitudes towards political action in addressing Planetary Health issues. Adult and adult mental health nursing students from two British universities participated in the Political Action Sequential Simulation which had three scenarios related to either water or air pollution. Scenario one was clinical, while scenarios two and three were community- and policy-based, respectively. We used a pre-post design to gauge attitudes and values both before and after the intervention. Outcomes measures included Nurse Professional Value Scale-3, Political Efficacy - Short Scale, Perceived Political Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form, Social Justice Scale and Internal Environmental Locus of Control scale. Of the 256 students who undertook the activity, 75 completed both pre and post-measures. Significant shifts across all scales except the social justice scale were found, meaning that students' attitudes towards political action, their beliefs in their ability to take political action, and in particular, action related to the environment shifted significantly after the sequential simulation. We discuss these results in the context of the broader literature, reflect on some of the reasons why these shifts occurred and consider the implications for nursing education and practice.

Indexed as

Global HealthPoliticsSimulation TrainingStudents, NursingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomattitudesnursing activismnursing advocacyplanetary healthpolitical actionsimulationundergraduate nursing studentsvalues

Identifiers

PMID40190272
PMCPMC11973622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.