ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Advance care planning discussions - Perspectives from oncology patients with advanced-stage disease.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advance care planning in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer: patients' perspectives on decision-making and their family and physicians' awareness of future care preferences.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- What is the appropriate timing for advance care planning according to patients and their relatives? A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Knowledge of advance care planning and advance directives among US adults: Implications for health policy and practice.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence in the literature confirms that advance care planning (ACP) discussions, assumed to benefit patients, their caregivers, and clinicians, occur at various rates, lower than intended and not as early as thought to be beneficial. The literature, however, provides limited reasons why this trend continues. When ACP discussions do occur, particularly between clinicians and patients with advanced-stage cancer, we have even less understanding of the ACP experience. Thus, the goal of our study was to characterize patient beliefs and experiences pertaining to ACP discussions, and to explore factors that may be associated with patient experiences. One hundred adults with advanced cancer participated in this cross-sectional survey study. The majority (63%) had heard about ACP, and 81% believed that health care providers should have ACP discussions with their patients. However, only 23% of participants in this sample had an ACP discussion. Among those who reported having an ACP discussion, 74% indicated that they spoke with family members about ACP, and 48% reported having spoken with their oncologist about ACP. Among those who had not had an ACP discussion with a health care provider, commonly reported reasons for not doing so included the respondent's desire to speak with family members first and the perception that one was not sick enough to need such a discussion yet. These findings can be used to inform the development of future interventions to improve provider communication about ACP and enhance patient experiences around ACP discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.