Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190089›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025

Advance care planning discussions - Perspectives from oncology patients with advanced-stage disease.

Delinda Pendleton, Brian L Egleston, Carolyn Y Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Delinda PendletonPatient Experience and Strategic Clinical Initiatives, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3120-0220
Brian L EglestonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1633-799X
Carolyn Y FangCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
TUFCCC/HC Regional Comprehensive Cancer Health PartnershipU54CA221705 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Yin Tan · 2018 to 2026
$16.3M
TUFCCC/HC Regional Comprehensive Cancer Health PartnershipU54CA221704 · NCI · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI Ming-Chin Yeh · 2018 to 2026
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS U54 CA221704NCI NIH HHS U54 CA221705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence in the literature confirms that advance care planning (ACP) discussions, assumed to benefit patients, their caregivers, and clinicians, occur at various rates, lower than intended and not as early as thought to be beneficial. The literature, however, provides limited reasons why this trend continues. When ACP discussions do occur, particularly between clinicians and patients with advanced-stage cancer, we have even less understanding of the ACP experience. Thus, the goal of our study was to characterize patient beliefs and experiences pertaining to ACP discussions, and to explore factors that may be associated with patient experiences. One hundred adults with advanced cancer participated in this cross-sectional survey study. The majority (63%) had heard about ACP, and 81% believed that health care providers should have ACP discussions with their patients. However, only 23% of participants in this sample had an ACP discussion. Among those who reported having an ACP discussion, 74% indicated that they spoke with family members about ACP, and 48% reported having spoken with their oncologist about ACP. Among those who had not had an ACP discussion with a health care provider, commonly reported reasons for not doing so included the respondent's desire to speak with family members first and the perception that one was not sick enough to need such a discussion yet. These findings can be used to inform the development of future interventions to improve provider communication about ACP and enhance patient experiences around ACP discussions.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningNeoplasmsPerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance care planningadvance care planning discussionspatient perspectives

Identifiers

PMID40190089
PMCPMC12057683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.