ArticleInternational journal of laboratory hematology2025
Next Generation Sequencing Identifies Subgroups of Patients With Triple Negative Primary Thrombocytosis With Different Clinical Thrombotic Outcomes.
Article in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next Generation Sequencing Identifies Subgroups of Patients With Triple Negative Primary Thrombocytosis With Different Clinical Thrombotic Outcomes.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe majority of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) show somatic mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL. Around 10% of cases lack these mutations ("triple negative" ET, TN-ET). Additionally, some patients with bona fide "primary thrombocytosis" (PT) [i.e., high platelet (PLT)- count with no apparent underlying causes] do not fulfill the histologic criteria of ET. In this context, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) can provide evidence of clonality and identify patients with different clinical behaviors.
methodsWe conducted a retro-prospective analysis of 39 patients with TN-PT and correlated the clinical and pathologic features with the molecular findings.
resultsBone marrow histopathological features were consistent with ET in 60% of cases. After a mean follow up of 11.1 years, no cases of secondary myelofibrosis nor acute leukemia were observed. We reported 15 thrombotic events (TEs) in 10 (25.6%) patients. Considering mutations with a variant frequency ≥ 5%, 15.4% of patients showed at least one mutation ("NGS-positive"); the remaining had no mutations ("NGS-negative"). NGS status predicted the incidence of TEs: NGS-positive patients experienced a significantly higher rate of TEs compared to NGS-negative patients (66.6% vs. 18.2%, respectively; p = 0.01).
conclusionNGS status represents an adjunctive risk factor for thrombosis in TN-PT and provides useful clinical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.