Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189932›Full record

ReviewThoracic cancer2025

PD-L1 Scoring Models for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: Current Status, AI-Assisted Solutions and Future Perspectives.

Ziling Huang, Shen Wang, Jiansong Zhou, Haiquan Chen, Yuan Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ziling HuangDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-1270
Shen WangSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiansong ZhouValue & Implementation, Global Medical & Scientific Affairs, MSD China, Shanghai, China.
Haiquan ChenDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7846-257X
Yuan LiDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

MSD ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF1201001The Institution and Governmental Cooperative Project, Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology Committee 23XHYD-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment model for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Numerous clinical trials and real-world reports have confirmed that PD-L1 status is a key factor for the successful use of immunotherapy in NSCLC, by predicting clinical outcomes and identifying patients most likely to benefit from this treatment. Therefore, accurate and standardized evaluation of PD-L1 expression is crucial. Currently, PD-L1 testing in China faces several challenges, including a heavy pathologist workload, a shortage of highly trained pathologists plus the inadequate capacity of diagnostic laboratories, confusion around different scoring methods, cut-off values, and indications, and limited concordance between PD-L1 assays. In this review, we summarize the current status and limitations of PD-L1 testing for patients with NSCLC in China and discuss recent progress in artificial intelligence-assisted PD-L1 scoring. Our review aims to support improvements in clinical PD-L1 testing practice and optimization of the prognosis and outcomes of immunotherapy in this patient population.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsChinaHumansImmunotherapyPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanartificial intelligenceimmunohistochemistrynon‐small cell lung cancerPD‐L1

Identifiers

PMID40189932
PMCPMC11973252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.