ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2025
Patient Portal Use Among Patients With Vascular Anomalies and Their Caregivers.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with vascular anomalies (VAs) experience poor communication and have unmet information needs. Online patient portals could mitigate communication barriers and support communication interventions. However, these portals are often underutilized. PROCEDURE: We retrospectively queried audit-log data from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of a single large academic healthcare center for all patients seen by clinicians from a multidisciplinary specialist clinic with a diagnosed VA from January 2020 to January 2024. We connected audit-log data with patient demographics to examine how patients used the portal, and whether use varied by patient characteristics.
resultsWe queried portal usage for 315 patients with vascular anomalies, of whom 43% were children, 19% were adolescents, and 38% were adults. Approximately half of patients' portals were logged into during the study period (51%, n = 162). Of users who ever logged into the portal, the median number of logins per year were 35 (interquartile range 15 to 95). Multiple regression results show that portal access was higher for patients who are White, reside in a metropolitan area, and have lower Area Deprivation Index. Of users who ever logged into the portal, 77% viewed clinician notes, 90% viewed test results, and 71% engaged in messaging with a clinician at least once.
conclusionHalf of patients and caregivers never use the portal, and patients from less urban areas with higher deprivation are even less likely to use the portal. As portals become more integrated into patient care, these inequities in portal access could lead to inequities in health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.