ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2025
Reducing Inequalities in Timing of Antenatal Care Initiation: A Hypothetical Intervention in the Generation R Study.
Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An alternative to causal mediation for inequality research: which questions can be answered?Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMuch research has focused on identifying predictors of late antenatal care initiation. Many of these predictors (e.g., young age, migration background, socioeconomic position) are impossible to modify, illustrating the need to explore other interventions.
objectivesThis study aims to investigate inequalities in antenatal care initiation and assess whether early pregnancy recognition may reduce these inequalities.
methodsData from Generation R were used (N = 4196), a population-based birth cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The association of gestational age at pregnancy recognition with the timing of antenatal care initiation and associations of individual and socioeconomic factors with the timing of antenatal care initiation were assessed using linear regression analyses. G-methods were used to estimate the reduction of the inequalities in antenatal care initiation if everyone would have recognised the pregnancy within 6 weeks.
resultsParticipants who recognised their pregnancy within 6 weeks (81.7%) had their first antenatal care visit 1.3 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.6, -0.9) earlier than those who recognised their pregnancy after 6 weeks. All individual and socioeconomic factors were associated with the timing of antenatal care initiation. Modelling a scenario where pregnancy recognition occurred within 6 weeks reduced inequalities in antenatal care initiation timing across several groups: age < 20 versus 30-35 (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.7, -0.2), first-generation migrants versus no migration (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unplanned/ambivalent versus planned pregnancies (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.6, -0.2), lower versus higher educational attainment (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unemployed versus employed (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), low versus high household income (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.3, 0.0), renters versus homeowners (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), and high versus low neighbourhood deprivation (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, -0.1).
conclusionsEarly recognition of pregnancy may help reduce the impact of socio-economic inequalities in the timely initiation of antenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.