Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189742›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2025

Digitalis Therapy Is Associated With an Increased Risk of ICD Shock Delivery and Device Revision.

Gerrit Frommeyer, Philipp S Lange, Thomas Kleemann, Christoph Stellbrink, Hüseyin Ince, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges, Lars Eckardt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gerrit FrommeyerClinic for Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-9886
Philipp S LangeClinic for Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thomas KleemannDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Christoph StellbrinkDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Hüseyin InceDepartment of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes BrachmannMedical School REGIOMED, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Thorsten LewalterDepartment of Medicine, Osypka Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany.
Matthias HochadelStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (IHF), Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Jochen SengesStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (IHF), Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Lars EckardtClinic for Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigitalis glycosides are employed for rate control of atrial fibrillation and treatment of heart failure. Previous studies suggested potential harmful effects of digitalis therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and potential impact of digitalis therapy on outcomes in patients with systolic failure who were implanted with an ICD- or CRT-ICD system. METHODS AND

resultsThe German Device Registry is a nationwide, prospective registry with a 1-year follow-up investigating 4384 patients receiving either ICD or CRT systems in 52 German centers. The present analysis focused on the presence of digitalis therapy in 3826 patients undergoing device implantation. Patients receiving digitalis therapy (n = 800) presented a more severely impaired left ventricular function, higher NYHA class, and an increased incidence of left bundle branch block. Consequently, the implantation of CRT systems was more common in this group. One-year mortality did not significantly differ between both groups (9.1% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.14). Similar results were obtained for the combined endpoint, including death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. ICD shock delivery (19.7% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.006) and device revision (11.4% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.004) were more common in digitalis-treated patients.

conclusionIn this study in patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation, an association of digitalis therapy with an increased risk of device revision was observed. Of note, mortality or severe cardiovascular events did not differ between both groups. Furthermore, an increased risk of ICD shock delivery was observed in digitalis-treated patients.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableDigitalis GlycosidesAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesReoperationDigitalis Glycosidescardiac resynchronization therapydigitalisheart failureimplantable cardioverter/defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID40189742
PMCPMC11972923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.