ArticleClinical oral implants research2025
Clinical Performance of Immediately Placed and Restored Implants With a Novel Design in the Esthetic Zone. A 3-Year Follow-Up of Prospective Case Series.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate Loading of Implants Placed Immediately in Fresh Sockets: A 10-Year Single-Arm Prospective Case Series Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of Immediately Placed and Restored Implants With a Novel Design in the Esthetic Zone. A 3-Year Follow-Up of Prospective Case Series.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo assess the medium-term implant success and survival rates of immediately placed and restored implants with a novel design in the esthetic zone. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of n = 20 patients had received immediately placed tapered, two-part implants with a progressive thread design (PL) (n = 20) and an immediate "non full-functional" loading (patient-specific abutments) for single tooth replacements in the anterior maxilla. Implant survival and success (e.g., bleeding on probing-BOP, probing pocket depth-PD, mucosal recession-MR) were assessed at 24 and 36 months following final restoration (i.e., 12 weeks after implant placement). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at 36 months.
resultsA total of four patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 16 patients included in the analysis. At 24 and 36 months, implant survival amounted to 100%, respectively. Non-significant changes to baseline were noted at 24 and 36 months for mean BOP (9.37 (29.7)%, 9.38 (26.5)%), PD (-0.45 (0.88)mm, -0.34 (0.74)mm), and MR (0.0 (0.0)mm, 0.0 (0.02)mm) values. Pink esthetic score-PES values amounted to 13.0 (1.22) and 12.62 (1.42) at 24 and 36 months. Technical and mechanical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 36 months.
conclusionsThe presented immediacy protocol was associated with high survival and success rates as well as a high patient satisfaction in the medium-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.