ArticleScientific reports2025
Using artificial intelligence system for assisting the classification of breast ultrasound glandular tissue components in dense breast tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BI-RADS v2025 for breast ultrasound: key updates and Asian perspectives.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Effect of a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ultrasound System on BI-RADS C4 Breast Lesions Based on Breast Density.Cancers · 2026Article
- ABUS-based glandular tissue component classification for breast cancer risk prediction in Chinese women with dense breasts: a retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the potential of employing artificial intelligence (AI) -driven breast ultrasound analysis models for the classification of glandular tissue components (GTC) in dense breast tissue. A total of 1,848 healthy women with mammograms classified as dense breast were enrolled in this prospective study. Residual Network (ResNet) 101 classification model and ResNet with fully Convolutional Networks (ResNet + FCN) segmentation model were trained. The better effective model was selected to appraise the classification performance of 3 breast radiologists and 3 non-breast radiologists. The evaluation metrics included sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). The ResNet101 model demonstrated superior performance compared to the ResNet + FCN model. It significantly enhanced the classification sensitivity of all radiologists by 0.060, 0.021, 0.170, 0.009, 0.052, and 0.047, respectively. For P1 to P4 glandular, the PPVs of all radiologists increased by 0.154, 0.178, 0.027, and 0.109 with Ai-assisted. Notably, the non-breast radiologists experienced a particularly substantial rise in PPV (p < 0.01). This study trained ResNet 101 deep learning model is a reliable and accurate system for assisting different experienced radiologists differentiate dense breast glandular tissue components in ultrasound images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.