ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational insights into exploring the potential effects of environmental contaminants on human health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With rapid industrialization and urbanization, the increasing prevalence of air and water pollutants poses a significant threat to public health. Traditional research methods, such as epidemiological studies and in vitro/in vivo experiments, provide valuable biological insights but are often costly, time-consuming, and limited in scale. To address this gap, this study develops a machine learning-based approach to predict the carcinogenicity of pollutants. Using the dataset of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic molecules that we collected, the pretrained KPGT model trained with molecular fingerprints and descriptors achieved an AUC of 0.83, surpassing traditional machine learning models. To validate this model, common pollutants from air and water sources were analyzed. Further clustering classified these pollutants into five distinct groups. Target prediction analysis identified key genes associated with representative pollutant molecules, such as MAPK1, MTOR, and PTPN11. GO and KEGG pathway analyses, along with survival analysis, revealed potential carcinogenic mechanisms and prognostic implications. Our findings contribute to improved pollution risk assessment and evidence-based environmental policy development, ultimately aiding in the mitigation of pollutant-related health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.