ArticleScientific reports2025
An explainable hybrid feature aggregation network with residual inception positional encoding attention and EfficientNet for cassava leaf disease classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PlantCLR: contrastive self-supervised pretraining for generalizable plant disease detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An attention enhanced CNN ensemble for interpretable and accurate cotton leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A lightweight and generalizable deep learning framework for early detection of rice leaf diseases in complex field environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leaf disease detection and classification in food crops with efficient feature dimensionality reduction.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cassava is a tuberous edible plant native to the American tropics and is essential for its versatile applications including cassava flour, bread, tapioca, and laundry starch. Cassava leaf diseases reduce crop yields, elevate production costs, and disrupt market stability. This places significant burdens on farmers and economies while highlighting the need for effective management strategies. Traditional methods of manual disease diagnosis are costly, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. This research aims to address the challenge of accurate disease classification by overcoming the limitations of existing methods, which encounter difficulties with the complexity and variability of leaf disease symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to propose a novel dual-track feature aggregation architecture that integrates the Residual Inception Positional Encoding Attention (RIPEA) Network with EfficientNet for the classification of cassava leaf diseases. The proposed model employs a dual-track feature aggregation architecture which integrates the RIPEA Network with EfficientNet. The RIPEA track extracts significant features by leveraging residual connections for preserving gradients and uses multi-scale feature fusion for combining fine-grained details with broader patterns. It also incorporates Coordinate and Mixed Attention mechanisms which focus on cross-channel and long-range dependencies. The extracted features from both tracks are aggregated for classification. Furthermore, it incorporates an image augmentation method and a cosine decay learning rate schedule to improve model training. This improves the ability of the model to accurately differentiate between Cassava Bacterial Blight (CBB), Brown Streak Disease (CBSD), Green Mottle (CGM), Mosaic Disease (CMD), and healthy leaves, addressing both local textures and global structures. Additionally, to enhance the interpretability of the model, we apply Grad-CAM to provide visual explanations for the model's decision-making process, helping to understand which regions of the leaf images contribute to the classification results. The proposed network achieved a classification accuracy of 93.06%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.