Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189676›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models to predict distant metastasis and prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.

Qian Deng, Shan Li, Yuxiang Zhang, Yuanyuan Jia, Yanhui Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian Deng *Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Shan Li *Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuxiang ZhangDepartment of Urology Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Yuanyuan Jia *Department of Oncology, Huai'an Second People's Hospital, Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China. 516791229@qq.com.
Yanhui Yang *Department of Emergency Surgery (Trauma Center), The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China. hkdyyh2024@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) is a more aggressive disease than non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), with greater chances of metastasis. We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict metastasis and prognosis in MIBC patients. Clinical data of MIBC cases from 2000 to 2020 were sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Clinical variables used to predict DM were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). Thirteen ML models predicting DM were evaluated based on AUC, PRAUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, cross-entropy, Brier score, balanced accuracy, and F-beta score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework helped interpret the best model. Additionally, we utilized ML algorithm combinations to predict prognosis in MIBC patients with metastasis. A total of 43,951 T2-T4 MIBC patients aged over 18 years old from the SEER database were enrolled consecutively. Nine clinical variables were selected to predict DM. The CatBoost model was identified as the optimal predictor, with AUC values of 0.956 [0.933, 0.969] for the training set, 0.882 [0.857, 0.919] for the internal test set, and 0.839 [0.723, 0.936] for the external test set. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.875 [0.854, 0.896], sensitivity of 0.869 [0.851, 0.889], specificity of 0.883 [0.823, 0.912], and precision of 0.917 [0.885, 0.944]. SHAP analysis revealed that tumor size was the most influential factor in predicting distant metastasis. For prognosis, the "RSF + Enet[alpha = 0.8]" model emerged as the top performer, with C-index values of 0.683 in training, 0.688 in the internal test, and 0.666 in the external test sets. Our ML models provide high accuracy and dependability, delivering refined, individualized predictions for metastasis risk and prognosis in MIBC patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisSEER ProgramDistant metastasisMachine learningMuscle-Invasive bladder CancerPrognosis predictionSEER

Identifiers

PMID40189676
PMCPMC11973202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.