ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Evaluating the Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: impact on chemotherapy response score and prognosis in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, including advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). While some trials suggest potential benefits, the role of HIPEC during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in EOC remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing HIPEC during CRS for advanced-stage EOC in the United States (US).
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women with stage III-IV EOC who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between 2006 and 2021 at Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. Propensity score matching was used to create a control group of patients who underwent CRS only. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method and adjusted for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsAmong 1400 patients identified, 700 underwent CRS with HIPEC and 700 underwent CRS only. Of these 1400 patients, 932 underwent interval CRS and 468 underwent primary CRS. No significant difference in median OS was observed between the overall CRS+HIPEC and CRS-only groups (57.6 vs. 47.6 months; p = 0.105). However, interval CRS+HIPEC was associated with significantly improved median OS compared with interval CRS-only (57.6 vs. 45.7 months; p = 0.003). After adjustment, HIPEC remained significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).
conclusionsHIPEC is associated with improved OS in patients undergoing interval CRS for advanced-stage EOC. Further research should explore the selective use of HIPEC during interval CRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40189674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.