Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189661›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning for simultaneous phase and amplitude identification in coherent beam combination.

Fedor Chernikov, Yunhui Xie, James A Grant-Jacob, Yuchen Liu, Michalis N Zervas, Ben Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fedor ChernikovOptoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. fc1e21@soton.ac.uk.
Yunhui XieOptoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
James A Grant-JacobOptoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Yuchen LiuOptoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michalis N ZervasOptoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ben MillsOptoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

EPSRC EP/W028786/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coherent beam combination has emerged as a promising strategy for overcoming the power limitations of individual fibre lasers. This approach relies on maintaining precise phase difference between the constituent beamlets, which are typically established using phase retrieval algorithms. However, phase locking is often studied under the assumption that the power levels of the beamlets remain stable, an idealisation that does not hold always in practical applications. Over the operational lifetime of fibre lasers, power degradation inevitably occurs, introducing additional challenges to phase retrieval. To address this, we propose a deep learning algorithm for single-step simultaneous phase and amplitude identification, directly from a single camera observation of the intensity distribution of the combined beam. By leveraging its ability to detect and interpret subtle variations in intensity interference patterns, the deep learning approach can accurately disentangle phase and power contributions, even in the presence of significant power fluctuations. Using a spatial light modulator, we systematically investigate the impact of power-level fluctuations on phase retrieval within a simulated coherent beam combination system. Furthermore, we explore the scalability of this deep learning approach by evaluating its ability to achieve the required phase and amplitude precision as the number of beamlets increases.

Identifiers

PMID40189661
PMCPMC11973209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.