Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a prespecified subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study by age subgroup.
Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Esaxerenone versus angiotensin II receptor blockers as second-line therapy in older Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension on calcium channel blockers: the randomized, open-label ESCORT-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Effect of Body Mass Index on the Efficacy and Safety of Esaxerenone Versus Trichlormethiazide for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Uncontrolled Essential Hypertension: A Subanalysis of the Excite-HT Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for the treatment of uncontrolled essential hypertension in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Effect of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels on the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: a subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus angiotensin II receptor blockers in older patients with hypertension, with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a predefined subgroup analysis of the ESCORT-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This predefined subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to determine whether the comparative efficacy and safety of esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide differs with age. Patients were divided into two age subgroups (<65 and ≥65 years). The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was assessed based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) changes. Esaxerenone was considered non-inferior if this value was <3.9/ < 2.1 mmHg; if it was <0 mmHg, esaxerenone was considered superior in its BP-lowering effect. The results showed that the least squares mean changes in morning home SBP/DBP from baseline to the end of treatment (primary endpoint) were -9.5/-5.7 with esaxerenone and -8.2/-4.9 mmHg with trichloromethiazide (between-group difference: -1.3 [95% CI, -3.3, 0.8]/-0.8 [ - 2.1, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged <65 years. These changes were -14.6/-7.2 and -11.5/-6.7 (-3.0 [-4.9, -1.2]/-0.5 [-1.5, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged ≥65 years. The incidences of serum potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L were 2.2% and 1.9% in the esaxerenone-treated subgroups aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. In conclusion, esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged <65 years, esaxerenone achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering both SBP and DBP. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone was superior to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP and achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering DBP. The impact of esaxerenone on serum potassium levels did not show a specific age-related effect. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to age (<65 and ≥65 years) showed that esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone achieved the superiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.