ArticleScientific reports2025
Layer combination of similar infill patterns on the tensile and compression behavior of 3D printed PLA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- 3D-Printed PLA/HA Composite Scaffolds: Balancing Mechanical Properties for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Influence of Certain Operating Conditions of the FDM Process on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Materials-A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of additively manufactured PLA models as cost-effective, non-inferior alternatives to composite bones for pull-out testing.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Enhanced Energy Absorption and Flexural Performance of 3D Printed Sandwich Panels Using Slicer-Generated Interlocking Interfaces.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the growing popularity of 3D-printed products, material consumption has been a major concern in additive manufacturing in recent years. Choosing the infill structure and the printing parameters for an application can be challenging for product designers and engineers, which can lead to reduced material and increased cost savings while maintaining product functioning.This study investigates the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed PLA structures by exploring the influence of multi-layer infill patterns on tensile and compressive strength. Three common infill patterns (triangular, grid, and honeycomb) were evaluated at 20% and 50% densities. A novel approach was employed, incorporating specimens with single-, two-, and four-layer same pattern combinations, where subsequent layers were rotated 180 degrees to enhance interlayer bonding. Results demonstrated significant improvements in both tensile (up to 64%) and compressive strength (up to 47%) for two-layer structures compared to single-layer counterparts. The findings provide valuable insights into optimizing infill design and layer configurations for improved tensile and compressive strength and material efficiency in 3D-printed structures. This research highlights the potential for optimizing 3D-printed part performance through strategic multi-layer infill design, offering a pathway toward reduced material consumption and enhanced mechanical properties in additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.