Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189629›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Layer combination of similar infill patterns on the tensile and compression behavior of 3D printed PLA.

Menna G Aboelella, Samy J Ebeid, Moustafa M Sayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Menna G AboelellaDesign and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Samy J EbeidDesign and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Moustafa M SayedDesign and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. m_m_sayed@eng.asu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing popularity of 3D-printed products, material consumption has been a major concern in additive manufacturing in recent years. Choosing the infill structure and the printing parameters for an application can be challenging for product designers and engineers, which can lead to reduced material and increased cost savings while maintaining product functioning.This study investigates the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed PLA structures by exploring the influence of multi-layer infill patterns on tensile and compressive strength. Three common infill patterns (triangular, grid, and honeycomb) were evaluated at 20% and 50% densities. A novel approach was employed, incorporating specimens with single-, two-, and four-layer same pattern combinations, where subsequent layers were rotated 180 degrees to enhance interlayer bonding. Results demonstrated significant improvements in both tensile (up to 64%) and compressive strength (up to 47%) for two-layer structures compared to single-layer counterparts. The findings provide valuable insights into optimizing infill design and layer configurations for improved tensile and compressive strength and material efficiency in 3D-printed structures. This research highlights the potential for optimizing 3D-printed part performance through strategic multi-layer infill design, offering a pathway toward reduced material consumption and enhanced mechanical properties in additive manufacturing.

Indexed as

3D-printingAdditive manufacturingCombined infill patternsFused deposition modeling (FDM)Infill structurePolylactic acidPolymer

Identifiers

PMID40189629
PMCPMC11973139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.