ArticleScientific reports2025
Neck dose-limiting rings reduce head and neck lymphedema in early nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT: a dosimetric-clinical validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The biological characteristics of tertiary lymphoid structures in head and neck cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the optimal limiting dose to reduce head and neck lymphedema in patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by setting dose limiting rings at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck. A total of 15 patients with early NPC were included, and 5 sets of IMRT plans were designed for each patient. Plan A was a conventional plan without dose limiting rings, while Plans B-E were set dose limiting rings with gradients of 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy, and 14 Gy, respectively, whose remaining parameters were consistent with Plan A. Through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for randomized block design data and Bonferroni pairwise multiple comparisons, the impact of dose limiting rings on target coverage and doses to organs at risk was evaluated and the optimal limiting dose was determined. After that, 50 patients with early NPC (25 with rings according to the optimal limiting dose, 25 without rings) were treated with IMRT to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of head and neck lymphedema. Ultimately, 16 Gy was determined as the optimal limiting dose threshold for achieving the balance of target coverage and protection of organs at risk. Compared with the conventional plan, setting cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings of 16 Gy did not affect the target dose coverage (all P > 0.05), only slightly affected homogeneity index and increased monitor units (MUs) (both P < 0.05). The doses of the inner ears, mandible, and brainstem were not affected (all P > 0.05), meanwhile, the doses of the oral cavity, larynx, and thyroid were reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). The doses of the parotid glands and spinal cord slightly increased (both P < 0.05), but still within the tolerance range. Clinical cohort verification showed that setting the dose limiting rings of 16 Gy at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck significantly reduced the occurrence of head and neck lymphedema (P < 0.05). Through dosimetric and clinical cohort verification studies, the optimal limiting dose for the cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings has been determined, hoping to provide a new design method of IMRT plans to reduce head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy for early NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.