ArticleScientific reports2025
Achieving high quality electron beam with ultralow energy spread from mismatched plasma channels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intense electric fields generated by laser plasma wakefield accelerators can rapidly accelerate electrons to high energies over short distances, potentially reducing both the length and cost of accelerator facilities significantly. However, the electron beams produced often exhibit substantial energy spreads, which imposes significant constraints on their broader applicability. We propose a novel method for reducing energy spread by utilizing periodic changes in the acceleration field slope induced by mismatched plasma channels, allowing for periodic compensation of the energy spread. Simulations of a 1 GeV, 10 pC electron accelerator demonstrate that this method can reduce the energy spread of the electron beam to 0.17%, while effectively preserving other beam quality parameters. This approach is approaching the state-of-the-art in laser plasma wakefield accelerators and holds promise for applications in free electron lasers and synchrotron radiation source injectors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.