Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189576›Full record

ReviewCell communication and signaling : CCS2025

NEK8, a NIMA-family protein kinase at the core of the ciliary INV complex.

Joan Roig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joan RoigDepartment of Cells and Tissues, Cell Cycle and Signaling Research Group, Molecular Biology Institute of Barcelona (IBMB-CSIC), Baldiri I Reixac 10-12, Barcelona, 08028, Spain. jrabmc@ibmb.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we describe the current knowledge about the ciliary kinase NEK8, highlighting what we know and what we don't know about its regulation, substrates and potential functions. We also review the literature about the pathological consequences of different NEK8 variants in patients of nephronophthisis, renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, three different types of ciliopathies. NEK8 belongs to the NIMA family of serine/threonine protein kinases. Like its closest relative, NEK9, it contains a protein kinase and an RCC1 domain, but lacks the C-terminal region that is key for NEK9's regulation as a G2/M kinase. Importantly, NEK8 localizes to cilia as part of a multimeric protein complex that assembles in a fibrillar fashion at the proximal half of this signaling organelle, defining what is known as the INV compartment. NEK8 and its INV compartment partners inversin, ANKS6 and NPHP3 are necessary for left-right determination and the correct development of different organs such as the kidney, the heart and the liver. But the kinase substrates, regulatory mechanism and activating cues and thus the molecular basis of NEK8 important physiological roles remain elusive. We present the current findings regarding NEK8 and also highlight what we miss in order to progress towards the understanding of the kinase and the function of the INV complex at the cilia.

Indexed as

CiliaNIMA-Related KinasesAnimalsCiliopathiesHumansTranscription FactorsINVS protein, humanNEK8 protein, humanNIMA-Related KinasesTranscription FactorsCiliaINV compartmentNEKNIMA familyProtein kinase

Identifiers

PMID40189576
PMCPMC11974183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.