ArticleBMC medicine2025
The response to anti-seizure medications and the development of pharmacoresistant epilepsy in malformations of cortical development.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE): genetics, mechanisms and precision therapy.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
- DPP-4 inhibitors in drug-resistant epilepsy: a hypothesized mechanism via the gut microbiota-short-chain fatty acids-glucagon-like peptide-1 axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalformations of cortical development (MCD) are a group of congenital brain malformation disorders commonly associated with pharmacoresistant epilepsy (PRE). While studies often focus on surgery outcomes, the pharmacological treatment is still imperative and the odyssey to PRE remains underexplored. We aim to investigate the influence of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) on the development of PRE in this specific patient population.
methodsWe retrospectively included a cohort of epilepsy patients with MRI-confirmed MCD due to abnormal cell proliferation and apoptosis (group I, mainly FCD II), and abnormal neuronal migration (group II, mainly heterotopia, lissencephaly, and polymicrogyria) from March 2013 to June 2023. The clinical features of group I and group II were compared. Factors associated with PRE were analyzed. The time to development of PRE with different ASMs was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
resultsOf 259 enrolled patients with epilepsy and MRI-confirmed MCD (group I, n = 121; group II, n = 138), 73.4% met the criteria for PRE. The median duration of follow-up from seizure onset to the last visit or surgery was 103 months (IQR 45-174), with group I showing a significantly higher PRE rate than group II (90.1% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.000). Binomial regression analysis identified the significant predictors of PRE in MCD patients: high pretreatment seizure frequency (OR = 2.506), group II patients (OR = 0.248), and failure of the first ASM (OR = 5.885). Sodium channel blockers (SCBs) were the most prescribed initial ASMs and demonstrated a higher response rate than other ASMs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that using SCBs as the first ASM significantly prolongs the time to PRE, with a median of 72 months for SCB users versus 48 months for non-SCB users.
conclusionsOur findings indicate a high prevalence of PRE that varies among different subtypes of MCD. Early appropriate selection of ASMs, particularly SCBs, can significantly delay the time to PRE onset, offering a promising strategy for managing this complex patient population. Tailoring pharmacological approaches is crucial for optimizing outcomes, and further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.