ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
ECG-based heart arrhythmia classification using feature engineering and a hybrid stacked machine learning.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- HAT-ECG: Hybrid autoencoder-transformer architecture for ECG arrhythmia classification.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Time series electrocardiography (ECG) data for early prediction of cardiac arrest.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Wearable Electrocardiogram: A Primer on Wearable-Enabled Prediction of Cardiac Dysfunction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research on cross-dataset cardiac signal domain generalization and feature interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MS-LTCAF: A Multi-Scale Lead-Temporal Co-Attention Framework for ECG Arrhythmia Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A heart arrhythmia refers to a set of conditions characterized by irregular heart- beats, with an increasing mortality rate in recent years. Regular monitoring is essential for effective management, as early detection and timely treatment greatly improve survival outcomes. The electrocardiogram (ECG) remains the standard method for detecting arrhythmias, traditionally analyzed by cardiolo- gists and clinical experts. However, the incorporation of automated technology and computer-assisted systems offers substantial support in the accurate diagno- sis of heart arrhythmias. This research focused on developing a hybrid model with stack classifiers, which are state-of-the-art ensemble machine-learning techniques to accurately classify heart arrhythmias from ECG signals, eliminating the need for extensive human intervention. Other conventional machine-learning, bagging, and boosting ensemble algorithms were also explored along with the proposed stack classifiers. The classifiers were trained with a different number of features (50, 65, 80, 95) selected by feature engineering techniques (PCA, Chi-Square, RFE) from a dataset as the most important ones. As an outcome, the stack clas- sifier with XGBoost as the meta-classifier, trained with 65 important features determined by the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique, achieved the best performance among all the models. The proposed classifier achieved a perfor- mance of 99.58% accuracy, 99.57% precision, 99.58% recall, and 99.57% f1-score and can be promising for arrhythmia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.