Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40189473›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Clarity AD: Asian regional analysis of a phase III trial of lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease.

Christopher Chen, Sadao Katayama, Jae-Hong Lee, Jun-Young Lee, Masaki Nakagawa, Kentaro Torii, Tomoo Ogawa, Amitabh Dash, Michael Irizarry, Shobha Dhadda and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Regulatory, clinical, and post-marketing challenges of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: insights from real-world data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ATNIVS biomarker heterogeneity in real-world patients receiving lecanemab.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The evolving landscape of amyloid-targeting therapies in Alzheimer's disease: progress and challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christopher ChenMemory Aging and Cognition Center, Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Sadao KatayamaKatayama Medical Clinic, Kurashiki, Japan.
Jae-Hong LeeDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jun-Young LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Masaki NakagawaEisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro ToriiEisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoo OgawaEisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Amitabh DashEisai Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore.
Michael IrizarryEisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Shobha DhaddaEisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Michio KanekiyoEisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Steve HerschEisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Takeshi IwatsuboDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan; National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: iwatsubo@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcross Asia, Alzheimer's disease prevalence is expected to rise dramatically due to, among other factors, rapidly aging populations. Alzheimer's disease pathology is triggered by the accumulation of soluble and insoluble aggregated Aβ peptides (oligomers, protofibrils, and fibrils). Lecanemab is a recently approved humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that preferentially targets soluble aggregated Aβ species (oligomers, protofibrils), with activity at insoluble fibrils. In the recent 18-month phase 3 Clarity AD study, lecanemab demonstrated a consistent slowing of decline in clinical (global, cognitive, functional, and quality of life) outcomes, and reduction in brain amyloid in early Alzheimer's disease. Lecanemab was well tolerated in Clarity AD, with an increase in incidence of infusion related reactions and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) versus placebo.

objectivesThe objective of this manuscript is to present the results for the Asian region population of Clarity AD.

designThe core Clarity AD study was an 18-month, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

settingAcademic and clinical centers in Asia

participantsA total of 294 individuals with early Alzheimer's disease (i.e., mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease).

interventionEligible patients were randomized across 2 treatment groups (placebo and lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly) according to a fixed 1:1 schedule. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy endpoint in the core study was change in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum-of-Boxes (CDR-SB) from baseline at 18 months. Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline at 18 months in amyloid PET Centiloids (in patients participating in the amyloid PET sub-study), AD COMposite Score (ADCOMS) and AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14 (ADAS-Cog14). Safety was monitored throughout the study in a blinded manner by the sponsor and in an unblinded manner by an independent data safety monitoring committee.

resultsOf the total of 1795 subjects randomized in Clarity AD, 294 subjects were in the Asian region (Japan:152; Korea:129; Singapore:13). The efficacy of lecanemab was consistent with the overall population. For the primary endpoint, there was a slowing of decline with lecanemab in the CDR-SB at 18 months compared to placebo in the Asian region (adjusted mean difference: -0.349; 95 % confidence intervals: -0.773, 0.076; 24 % slowing of decline). Results for the secondary efficacy endpoints also favored lecanemab versus placebo in Asians. Lecanemab was well tolerated in Asian subjects, with a safety profile in Asian subjects similar to the overall Clarity AD population. The most common adverse events of special interest were ARIA-H (lecanemab:14.4 %; placebo:16.2 %), ARIA-E (lecanemab:6.2 %; placebo:1.4 %), and infusion-related reactions (lecanemab:12.3 %; placebo:1.4 %). Incidence of adverse events leading to study drug dose interruption or withdrawal, infusion-related reactions, ARIA-E and ARIA-H was lower for the lecanemab treated group in the Asian region relative to the overall Clarity AD population. Results from quality of life and biomarker assessments in the Asia region were also generally similar to the overall Clarity AD population.

conclusionIn the Clarity AD Asian region cohort, the overall efficacy, biomarker changes and safety profile of lecanemab were consistent with the overall population, with a favorable risk-benefit profile and manageable risks. ARIA events and infusion-related reactions occurred less commonly with lecanemab in the Asian region subgroup than the overall population.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesAsiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAlzheimer's diseaseLecanemab, disease modification

Identifiers

PMID40189473
PMCPMC12184022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.