ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2025
Inexpensive thermal containers and insulation materials prevent deterioration of semen parameters for less than 90 minutes.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male infertility contributes substantially to overall infertility, with temperature changes adversely affecting the sperm quality. During infertility treatments, the exposure of home-collected semen to extreme temperatures during transport deteriorates the semen parameters. This study investigates the effectiveness of thermal containers and insulation materials for preserving semen quality at low temperatures. Semen samples from 35 healthy male partners undergoing fertility treatments were analyzed. The samples were segregated in three groups and assessed: standard collection containers (Group A), thermal containers (Group B), and thermal containers with warming materials (Group C). Samples exposed to 4°C exhibited a notable decline in motility and forward motility over time, whereas groups B and C maintained these parameters better. Group C maintained the internal temperature at approximately 20°C for up to 90 min, reducing cold-induced deterioration. These findings demonstrate that cost-effective thermal retention methods can preserve semen quality during transport, and potentially improve the outcomes of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.