ArticleHospital pediatrics2025
Intravenous Dexamethasone Use and Outcomes in Children Hospitalized With Septic Arthritis.
Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeptic arthritis is routinely treated with joint drainage and antibiotics; however, adjunctive systemic corticosteroids may improve outcomes.
objectivesTo (1) describe variation in intravenous dexamethasone use and (2) evaluate the association of intravenous dexamethasone use with outcomes among children hospitalized with septic arthritis.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized children using the Pediatric Health Information System database. We identified intravenous dexamethasone use (on hospital days 0-2) in children with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision discharge code for septic arthritis (M00.x). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included costs, postdrainage imaging, opioid use, repeat drainage procedures, and 30-day emergency department or hospital revisits. We used propensity score matching to account for measured differences between dexamethasone recipients and nonrecipients.
resultsWe identified 3524 hospitalizations across 47 hospitals from 2016 to 2020. The median rate of dexamethasone use across hospitals was 28% (IQR, 19%-44%). In the propensity-matched cohort, dexamethasone was associated with shorter LOS (100.5 vs 114.3 hours, P < .001) and lower costs ($16 660 vs $18 243, P = .01) but greater opioid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 1.49-9.70; P < .01). There were no significant differences in 30-day revisits (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29; P = .84), postdrainage computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.71-1.15; P = .42), or repeat drainage procedures (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .94).
conclusionIn this large cohort study, children with septic arthritis receiving dexamethasone had shorter hospital LOS and costs without higher 30-day revisit rates. Dexamethasone use varied widely across hospitals. These findings highlight the need for evaluation in a multicenter randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.