ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2025
Recruiting opioid treatment program administrators for a national survey: Outcomes and lessons learned.
Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trauma-Related Stress and Resilience in a Multistate Sample of Methadone Treatment Staff.Substance use : research and treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, access to opioid use disorder treatment remains insufficient. In the US, recent policy changes for opioid use disorder treatment present opportunities to improve patient access to evidence-based methadone treatment. To evaluate the adoption and sustained implementation of these changes, access to a national, representative sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs, 'methadone clinics') is essential. This study reports the outcomes of a recruitment effort for a national sample of OTP administrators.
methodsA stratified random sample of 1000 OTPs was drawn from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Opioid Treatment Program Directory. Stratification was based on state-level OTP regulations and county-level opioid overdose rates. OTPs identified as tribal serving, located in jails or prisons, or requiring corporate approval for research participation were deemed ineligible and excluded from the sample. A team of trained researchers called OTP clinics seeking to speak with administrators and obtain their email addresses for study recruitment.
resultsIn the sample, 885 OTPs were eligible for study recruitment. We contacted a live person by phone at 73 % of OTPs and an administrator at 23 %. Of the administrators reached, 77 % agreed to receive study information and 22 % completed the survey. Total caller time was 276.5 hours at a cost of $5530.
conclusionDespite a rigorous sampling frame, and a costly and considerable effort, US OTP recruitment outcomes were suboptimal. Innovative strategies are needed to improve administrator recruitment. Recommendations include updating the SAMHSA directory to include administrator contact information (name, phone, email), using diverse outreach methods, and refining call scripts to improve engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.