ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025
Economic and treatment burden among newly diagnosed patients with erosive esophagitis in the US: a national retrospective cohort study.
Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erosive esophagitis (EE) is a common complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Guidelines support long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to relieve symptoms and maintain healing of EE. Ideally, patients remain on their first line of therapy (LOT) with an effective PPI. We aimed to measure how often patients receive PPI, persistence and cycling among LOTs, and resulting healthcare resource utilization and costs. We assessed administrative claims data of patients diagnosed with EE between 0 October 2016 and 31 December 2020 using the Optum Research Database. We assessed prescribing rates of the first PPI, persistence, and rate of cycling among LOTs, health care resource utilization, and overall costs. Of 281,087 patients with EE, 178,789 had endoscopy. Overall, 27% of EE-diagnosed patients and 21% of patients in the endoscopy subgroup did not receive a PPI prescription. Among patients that did receive PPI, cycling and switching among PPIs was common, with over 50% of those patients switching to another PPI or back to a previously-used PPI after a lapse in therapy. Average total all-cause costs per patient among endoscopy patients (including patients with no record of PPI fills) were $58,692.46, and average total EE-related costs were $4304.88. Patients with EE frequently cycle and switch among PPIs. About one-fifth of patients who underwent endoscopy did not receive prescription PPI. Health care resource utilization and costs in patients with EE are substantial. PPI cycling and high discontinuation rates to PPI therapy contribute to costs associated with EE and potential delays in effective therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.