Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188435›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of frailty & aging2025

Maximising inclusivity in care home research: Lessons learned from the AFRI-c randomised controlled trial.

Laurel Campbell-Smith, Sophie Rees, Jane Sprackman, Karen Sargent, Alastair D Hay, Rachel Cm Brierley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of frailty & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurel Campbell-SmithBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sophie ReesBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jane SprackmanPatient and public contributor, UK.
Karen SargentPatient and public contributor, UK.
Alastair D HayCentre of Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rachel Cm BrierleyBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: R.Brierley@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethical and procedural requirements make research in care homes challenging. With people living longer globally, it is essential that older people are included in research, including within the care home setting. We conducted a randomised controlled trial (AFRI-c) in 91 care homes across England, aiming to make the study available to every eligible resident. Facilitators included flexible models for receiving consent; commitment from care home staff, residents and families; tailored and specific training for care home staff; and support from national research infrastructure to engage care homes in research. To facilitate inclusive care home research, we recommend consulting with care homes about their research priorities; continuing investment in national research infrastructure for care homes; using advance directives for research planning for care home residents; embedding research nurses in care home environments; and more guidance for researchers and ethics committees on applying legal frameworks regarding capacity to research settings.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesAgedEnglandHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBarriersCapacityCare homeConsentConsultee

Identifiers

PMID40188435
PMCPMC12183933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.