Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188407›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025

Comparison of autograft and allograft outcomes in adolescent ACL reconstruction: a propensity score analysis.

Daniele Screpis, Luca De Berardinis, Fjorela Qordja, Gianluca Piovan, Emanuele Giannini, Antonio Pompilio Gigante, Claudio Zorzi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniele ScrepisIRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Department of Orthopaedics, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Luca De BerardinisIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Orthopaedic and Trauma Unit, Milano, Italy.
Fjorela QordjaUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, Clinic of Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Ancona, Italy. qordja.fjorela@gmail.com.
Gianluca PiovanIRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Department of Orthopaedics, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Emanuele GianniniKinetic Center, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio Pompilio GiganteUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, Clinic of Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Ancona, Italy.
Claudio ZorziIRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Department of Orthopaedics, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess 3-year clinical and functional outcomes, complication rates and graft survival in adolescents with closed growth plates subjected to primary unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a hamstring autograft or an allograft. The failure rate reported in the literature reaches up to 20%.

methodsWe reviewed the records of 170 patients subjected to ACLR with a single-bundle autograft or an allograft from 2017 to 2020 with 3-year follow-up. Application of 1:2 Propensity Score Matching (PSM) considering age, sex, body mass index, injury to surgery interval, graft diameter and pre-injury Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) scores and Lysholm Knee Score (LKS) yielded 38 allografts and 62 autografts. We compared functional outcomes using the TAS, LKS and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) at 18 and 36 months and the failure rates, defined as need for revision surgery, before and after PSM.

resultsMean age ranged from 15.8 (standard deviation [SD], 1.2) to 15.9 (SD, 0.9) years and the pre-injury TAS ranged from 7.3 (SD, 1.0) to 7.3 (SD, 1.2) in allograft and autograft patients, respectively. Analysis of the LKS, TAS and IKDC values demonstrated comparable levels both before and after PSM, except for the pre-matching IKDC score and the post-matching TAS score at 36 months, which were significantly higher in autograft than allograft patients (p = 0.024 and p = 0.039, respectively). As regards graft failure, before PSM significantly more allografts (12/54) than autografts (5/116) required revision surgery (p < 0.001). After matching, the difference (6/38 vs 3/62, p = 0.079) was no longer significant.

conclusionOur cohort of active adolescent who underwent primary unilateral ACLR had a higher absolute number of failures in the allograft group compared to the autograft group, emphasizing the need for careful clinical consideration. However, after applying PSM, this difference, while numerically still present, lost statistical significance. This finding may suggest that when an allograft is deemed the most appropriate choice based on patient characteristics, its use may not necessarily expose the patient to a definitively higher risk of failure.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring TendonsAdolescentAllograftsAutograftsFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansMalePropensity ScoreReoperationRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeACLRAdolescentsAllograftAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionAutograftPropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID40188407
PMCPMC11972989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.