ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025
Complex PCI and 1-year outcomes in the OPTIVUS-complex PCI study multivessel cohort.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of isolated ostial LAD PCI versus multivessel PCI including ostial LAD lesions.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Ostial right coronary artery lesions: what to know and how to overcome.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2026.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It remains unknown whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve the clinical outcomes of complex PCI to a level equivalent to that of non-complex PCI. In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Complex PCI) Study multivessel cohort, a total of 1011 patients who underwent multivessel PCI involving a target lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were divided into 2 groups: complex PCI (N = 760) and non-complex PCI groups (N = 251). Complex PCI was defined as a procedure with the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, 3 stents implanted, 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length > 60 mm, or target of chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined by a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. The cumulative 1-year incidences of the primary endpoint and any coronary revascularization were not significantly different between the complex and non-complex PCI groups (10.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.24, and 7.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.12, respectively). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, there was no significant excess risk of the complex PCI group relative to the non-complex PCI group for the primary endpoint (HR, 1.35; 95%CI, 0.83-2.18; P = 0.22), or for any coronary revascularization (HR, 1.64; 95%CI, 0.87-3.06; P = 0.11). After optimal IVUS-guided multivessel PCI with a target lesion in the LAD, 1-year risk of MACCE or coronary revascularization in patients with complex PCI was numerically higher than that in patients with non-complex PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40188401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.