ArticleScientific reports2025
Anatomical study of ultrasound vs landmark guidance for needle placement in the obliquus capitis inferior.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Needling of obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) muscle could be an important intervention for individuals with upper cervical pain; however, precision is important due to its sensitive location. The aim was to assess the accuracy, safety and performance of needling OCI using palpation versus ultrasound-guidance in a cadaveric model. A cross-sectional anatomical study was conducted. Five therapists each performed a series of 20 needle insertion tasks (n = 100) on 10 anatomical samples. Distance from the needle tip to the target, if the OCI muscle belly was reached (accuracy), surrounding sensitive structures targeted (safety), time needed, number of needles passes, and the length of the needle remaining outside the skin were assessed. The ultrasound-guided procedure was associated with significantly greater accuracy and safety (p < 0.001). The ultrasound-guided procedure achieved 100% accuracy of reaching the OCI compared to 40% with the palpation-guided procedure, with a shorter distance from the needle tip to the target. In the palpation-guided procedure, potentially sensitive structures were pierced in 38% of cases compared to only 4% with the ultrasound-guided approach. However, the palpation-guided procedure required less time and fewer passes. Our findings suggest that ultrasound-guided procedure showed greater accuracy and safety than palpation-guided procedures for properly targeted the OCI muscle belly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.