ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Quality of prostate MRI in early diagnosis-a national survey and reading evaluation.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating prostate MRI: a practical review of modern acquisition strategies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- ESR Bridges: early-stage prostate cancer: new developments in imaging and treatment-a multidisciplinary view.European radiology · 2026Article
- Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.European journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe reliability of image-based recommendations in the prostate cancer pathway is partially dependent on prostate MRI image quality. We evaluated the current compliance with PI-RADSv2.1 technical recommendations and the prostate MRI image quality in the Netherlands. To aid image quality improvement, we identified factors that possibly influence image quality. MATERIALS AND
methodsA survey was sent to 68 Dutch medical centres to acquire information on prostate MRI acquisition. The responding medical centres were requested to provide anonymised prostate MRI examinations of biopsy-naive men suspected of prostate cancer. The images were evaluated for quality by three expert prostate radiologists. The compliance with PI-RADSv2.1 technical recommendations and the PI-QUALv2 score was calculated. Relationships between hardware, education of personnel, technical parameters, and/or patient preparation and both compliance and image quality were analysed using Pearson correlation, Mann-Whitney U-test, or Student's t-test where appropriate.
resultsForty-four medical centres submitted their compliance with PI-RADSv2.1 technical recommendations, and 26 medical centres completed the full survey. Thirteen hospitals provided 252 usable images. The mean compliance with technical recommendations was 79%. Inadequate PI-QUALv2 scores were given in 30.9% and 50.6% of the mp-MRI and bp-MRI examinations, respectively. Multiple factors with a possible relationship with image quality were identified.
conclusionIn the Netherlands, the average compliance with PI-RADSv2.1 technical recommendations is high. Prostate MRI image quality was inadequate in 30-50% of the provided examinations. Many factors not covered in the PI-RADSv2.1 technical recommendations can influence image quality. Improvement of prostate MRI image quality is needed. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: It is essential to improve the image quality of prostate MRIs, which can be achieved by addressing factors not covered in the PI-RADSv2.1 technical recommendations. KEY POINTS: Prostate MRI image quality influences the diagnostic accuracy of image-based decisions. Thirty to fifty percent of Dutch prostate MRI examinations were of inadequate image quality. We identified multiple factors with possible influence on image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.