ArticleScientific reports2025
Establishing a clinical prediction model for diabetic foot ulcers in type 2 diabetic patients with lower extremity arteriosclerotic occlusion using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for venous thromboembolism in patients with renal insufficiency.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic C-reactive protein trajectories predict prolonged healing time in diabetic wounds: a machine learning model based on a single-center cohort with standardized wound size.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- DFU-GCNet: a global context-enhanced inception network for robust and interpretable diabetic foot ulcer classification.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a diagnostic nomogram for Wagner grade≥2 diabetic foot ulcers in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Machine Learning Model Performance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Development and external validation of machine-learning based models to predict diabetic foot ulcer in diabetes population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The burden of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is exacerbated in diabetic patients with concomitant arteriosclerotic occlusion disease (ASO) in the lower extremities, who experience more severe symptoms and poorer prognoses. The study aims to develop a predictive model grounded in machine learning (ML) algorithms, specifically tailored to forecast the occurrence of DFU in diabetic patients with lower extremity ASO. The study involves the data from diabetic patients diagnosed with lower extremity ASO from January 1, 2011 to August 31, 2023. We conducted quality control on the data. Subsequently, the dataset was divided into a training set comprising patients before 2020 and a validation set comprising patients in 2020 and onwards. Patients were stratified into the DFU group or the non-DFU group based on the occurrence of DFU. Intergroup comparisons were conducted to analyze the differences between these two groups. Logistic regression analyses, 3 kinds of machine learning algorithms, a predictive model and nomogram was formulated to estimate the risk of DFU occurrence among diabetic patients with lower extremity ASO. Internal validation of the model was undertaken using the bootstrap method, combing with external temporal validation, with the results visually presented through the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Calibration curve. To evaluate the clinical practicality of the model, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and Clinical Impact Curve (CIC) were employed. Body Mass Index (BMI), hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetic nephropathy, the number of lower leg artery occlusions, controlling glucose by insulin injection, age, number of cigarettes smoked per day, diastolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were utilized to construct a clinical prediction model. This model exhibited a high predictive performance (AUC = 0.962), and the results from both internal validation and external temporal validation further confirmed its high accuracy and reproducibility (AUC = 0.968 and AUC = 0.977, respectively). Additionally, DCA and CIC demonstrated the high clinical practicality of this model. The clinical prediction model exhibited excellent accuracy and reproducibility, along with broad clinical practicality. It provides a good reference for the diagnosis and treatment of DFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.