ArticleScientific reports2025
A holistic assessment of water resources and management in the Zarrineh river sub basin using water accounting plus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive approach to enhancing irrigation network management through the water accounting plus framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coupling between water resource constraints and agricultural sustainability in Henan Province, China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate water consumption pathways related to land use, productivity, and water productivity in the Zarrineh River sub-basin, Iran, using the Water Accounting Plus (WA+) approach. The WA+ method was chosen due to its comprehensive ability to estimate water consumption across various sectors, including land use and agricultural productivity, and its capacity to account for both inflows and losses, which makes it more suitable for analyzing the water resource situation in the Zarrineh River sub-basin compared to other water accounting approaches. This study examines water inflows and losses in the Zarrineh River sub-basin, where total water availability, including external inputs and rainfall, reaches 3610.53 Million Cubic Meters (MCM) annually. Despite substantial water resources available, 3442.70 MCM is lost through evapotranspiration, with agricultural lands accounting for 1836.13 MCM of this. These findings emphasize the critical need for efficient irrigation systems, as well as complementary techniques like shading and mulching to minimize evaporation losses. With 1747.35 MCM of exploitable water, effective management practices are essential to maximize water productivity, especially in the agriculture sector. Additionally, 185.83 MCM of recoverable outflows present an opportunity for reuse, supporting more efficient water resource management. Managed agricultural areas exhibit higher water productivity (2.54 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.